Hegels negative Anthropologie?

Schüz, Simon

doi:10.1515/9783110716948-004

Negative Anthropologie 2021

DOI: 10.1515/9783110716948-004

|View full text |Cite

Hegels negative Anthropologie?

Simon Schüz¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Die Formierung der zweiten Natur: künstliche Natürlichkeit oder natürliche Künstlichkeit?

Schüz

2023

Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transformative theories of human nature posit that the genus of animality is wholly transformed by the specific difference of reason. The aim of this paper is to show that the two most prominent transformative approaches, ‘resolute’ and dialectical’, face a dialectical impasse that Helmuth Plessner’s philosophical anthropology is able to resolve. First, I outline objections to the resolute approach which motivate the ‘dialectical’ turn to second nature. Second, I show that the dialectical approach faces a dilemma. It either runs into an internal ‘interaction problem’ by its qualitative distinction of nature and spirit. Or it assimilates both in a way that either amounts to a collapse into the resolute approach or which creates the problem of a merely ‘artificial naturalness’. Third, I reconstruct Plessner’s ‘form-typological’ approach to how the genus living being is differentiated into structural types. This enables a dilemma-free rendition of transformation as ‘natural artificiality’: it is human first nature to seek embodied expression in second nature.

show abstract

Die Formierung der zweiten Natur: künstliche Natürlichkeit oder natürliche Künstlichkeit?

Schüz

2023

Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Hegels negative Anthropologie?

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Die Formierung der zweiten Natur: künstliche Natürlichkeit oder natürliche Künstlichkeit?

Die Formierung der zweiten Natur: künstliche Natürlichkeit oder natürliche Künstlichkeit?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About