2014
DOI: 10.1159/000358520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height, Muscle, Fat and Bone Response to Growth Hormone in Short Children with Very Low Birth Weight Born Appropriate for Gestational Age and Small for Gestational Age

Abstract: Background/Aims: Growth hormone (GH) treatment is approved for short children born SGA but not for AGA. Our aim was to study the effect of GH in short VLBW SGA and AGA children. Methods: The study group comprised 44 prepubertal short children with a birth weight <1,500 g: 27 AGA (12 females) and 17 SGA (6 females). Mean values at GH start were (AGA, SGA): age 6.94, 7.14 years, height standard deviation score (SDS) -3.33, -3.33, and GH dose (mean ± SD) 54 ± 12, 51 ± 11 µg/kg/day. Arm andcalf cross-sectional mus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we clarified body composition in short‐stature children born SGA and showed that they have reduced BMI‐SDS with VAT and SAT within or below the Japanese reference values. In line with the current results, the lean phenotype in short‐stature children born SGA has also been implicated, and most of the literature has shown that this was associated with reductions in both LBM and fat mass 20–22 . Despite these findings, Willemsen et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we clarified body composition in short‐stature children born SGA and showed that they have reduced BMI‐SDS with VAT and SAT within or below the Japanese reference values. In line with the current results, the lean phenotype in short‐stature children born SGA has also been implicated, and most of the literature has shown that this was associated with reductions in both LBM and fat mass 20–22 . Despite these findings, Willemsen et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In line with the current results, the lean phenotype in short-stature children born SGA has also been implicated, and most of the literature has shown that this was associated with reductions in both LBM and fat mass. [20][21][22] Despite these findings, Willemsen et al previously reported the body composition in these children and showed that the significant reduction in LBM-SDS was not observed when LBM-SDS was adjusted for height and sex, whereas FM-SDS significantly reduced even after adjustment for height and sex. 11 These findings indicate that decreases in FM predominantly affect the lean phenotype in children born SGA without catch-up growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We suppose that we did not find differences on lower limbs' strength between ISS and HC groups thanks to the effectiveness of the GH treatment to which the children with ISS were subjected, according to many previous studies reporting increases in muscle size and muscle strength in children treated [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the same way, Mauras et al reported higher levels of muscle strength after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) treatment in children with short stature [46]. Moreover, several researches demonstrated that long-term GH treatment in children with short stature increases muscle mass improving the related muscle strength [37,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous reports have shown that the body composition of short-stature children has different characteristics than that of normal children. In a casecontrol study comparing muscle mass between children with short stature and normal controls, fat-free mass, such as protein and bone minerals, was reported to be lower in children with short stature (14). GH treatment results in improvements in body composition and long-term beneficial effects on muscle and adipose tissues (15,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%