We developed the Strong Ties Weak Ties Rationality Scale (STWTRS) to demonstrate the heuristic value of the ontological turn which attempts to do justice to the cultural insider's picture of what is real. To test empirically the hypothesis of the existence of two distinct ontological universes that fall along the divide between strong ties and weak ties ontological framings, we used STWTRS to conduct a cross-cultural study (n = 961) using four samples (i.e., Taiwanese, Yi Chinese, Asian American, and non-Asian American). The results support our claim that the ontological universe of the cultural insider is not a list of fragmentary, ever expanding list of attributes that proliferate in cross-cultural psychology, so much as a coherent wholeness. We argue that this concept is best articulated by Maturana and Varela's (1980) theory of autopoietic living systems. Potential contributions to the literature and future research directions are discussed.
Public Significance StatementStrong Ties and Weak Ties Rationality Scale (STWTRS) was developed to enhance our understanding of the cultural insider. This approach to culture is basaed on two premises: First, cultural insiders are agents who need to construct a rational/logical universe in which they can do the right thing. Second, engaging the other as kin (strong-ties) or non-kin (weak-ties) are two primary rationalities that impact on how we relate to and reason about the world. Preliminary results on four cross cultural samples (n = 961) suggest that STWTRS is sensitive enough to capture traditional strong-ties rationality, thus holds the potential to reverse the current trend in cross-cultural measures that are more predictive of modern weak-ties than traditional strong-ties cultures.