2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.155134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heisenberg-Kitaev model in a magnetic field: 1/S expansion

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LSWT is valid up to O(1/S) and can return an unphysical result when the number of magnons is large relative to S. This occurs in the presence of low-lying flat magnon bands where the magnon-magnon interactions cannot be ignored. In such a case the LSWT breaks down and accurate calculation of observables requires a proper accounting of effects beyond the single-magnon picture, which already tend to be significant in noncollinear magnetic orders [61][62][63]. Nevertheless the reduced moment provides a general estimate of the regions of the classical phase space which are most susceptible to a quantum-disordered state [64], and we find that such a phase may be stabilized in the Γ dominant limit with moderate anisotropy.…”
Section: Effects Of Quantum Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The LSWT is valid up to O(1/S) and can return an unphysical result when the number of magnons is large relative to S. This occurs in the presence of low-lying flat magnon bands where the magnon-magnon interactions cannot be ignored. In such a case the LSWT breaks down and accurate calculation of observables requires a proper accounting of effects beyond the single-magnon picture, which already tend to be significant in noncollinear magnetic orders [61][62][63]. Nevertheless the reduced moment provides a general estimate of the regions of the classical phase space which are most susceptible to a quantum-disordered state [64], and we find that such a phase may be stabilized in the Γ dominant limit with moderate anisotropy.…”
Section: Effects Of Quantum Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For all other field orientations, the inhomogeneously canted extensions of the zero-field states compete not only with the polarized state, but also with new symmetry-broken phases that allow more favorable canting mechanisms. This gives rise to complex magnetic orderings and metamagnetic transitions at large S [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Model and Details Of The Ed Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the origin of the magnetic ordering, one has introduced additional interactions such as the Heisenberg and off-diagonal Γ terms in the Kitaev model [18][19][20][21][22][23]. While a lot of efforts have been devoted to clarifying the global phase diagrams of the Kitaev-Heisenberg and Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ models [23][24][25][26][27][28], the relationship to the candidate materials, in particular, the realistic values of the exchange constants, has been still under debate [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triggered by these experimental results, magnetic-field effects on the Kitaev-related systems have been studied theoretically [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Moreover, classical phase diagrams of the Kitaev-Heisenberg and Kitaev-Γ models under the magnetic field were obtained by the mean-field (MF) approach and Monte Carlo simulations [25][26][27][28]60]. In the phase diagrams, an applied magnetic field stabilizes various ordered states, including noncollinear and noncoplanar configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%