“…Across the research included in this review, a variety of outcome measures were observed, such as behavioral tests ( n = 9; 40.09%) ( 30 , 70 , 74–76 ), Sensory sensitivity testing ( 28 ), von Frey Testing ( 27 , 77 ), Light/dark test ( 27 ), Von frey test ( 27 ). To check the specific biomarker estimation ELISA ( n = 8; 36.36%) ( 30 , 31 , 72 , 74 , 75 , 77–79 ), Western blot analysis ( n = 9; 40.09%) ( 28 , 70 , 73–75 , 79–83 ), immunohistochemistry ( n = 4; 18.18%) ( 72 , 73 , 75 , 77 , 78 , 81 , 82 ), Histopathology ( 27 ), Immunofuorescence staining ( n = 9; 40.09%) ( 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 70 , 76 , 78 ), and for gene expression used qRT PCR ( n = 7; 31.81%) ( 27 , 28 , 31 , 70 , 74 , 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 , 83 ). The majority of researchers, around 60–70%, neglect to validate their experiments using behavioral tests, Western blotting, Immunofluorescence, and Immunohistochemistry, despite these tests being crucial for experimental validation.…”