1971
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90158-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helical complexes of polyriboinosinic acid with copolymers of polyribocytidylic acid containing inosine, adenosine and uridine residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This material was inactive in an aminoacylation assay (Karpel et al, 1975) but could be charged either by addition of Mg2+ to 0.01 M followed by heating to 60 °C for 5 min or by treatment with UP1 as previously described (Karpel et al, 1974(Karpel et al, , 1976. Nucleic acid concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically in the 1 mM Tris buffer (see above) by using the following extinction coefficients (in L mol-1 cm"1): poly(A), e260 = 1.00 X 104, which was found to be, within experimental error, the same as e257 in 0.195 M Na+ (Blake et al, 1967); poly(U), e261 = 9.43 X 103 (Blake et al, 1967); poly(C), e268 = 6.30 X 103 (Wang & Kallenbach, 1971); poly[d(A-T)], e260 (= e262) = 6.65 X 103 (Inman & Baldwin, 1962); inactive yeast tRNA)6U, <258 = 7.48 X 103, which was calculated from a molecular weight of 29500 (based on its sequence; Kowalski et al, 1971) and a e2581% of 215.5 for the inactive (formerly termed "denatured") conformer (Adams et al, 1967). Unless otherwise stated, all other chemicals utilized were of reagent or comparable grade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This material was inactive in an aminoacylation assay (Karpel et al, 1975) but could be charged either by addition of Mg2+ to 0.01 M followed by heating to 60 °C for 5 min or by treatment with UP1 as previously described (Karpel et al, 1974(Karpel et al, , 1976. Nucleic acid concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically in the 1 mM Tris buffer (see above) by using the following extinction coefficients (in L mol-1 cm"1): poly(A), e260 = 1.00 X 104, which was found to be, within experimental error, the same as e257 in 0.195 M Na+ (Blake et al, 1967); poly(U), e261 = 9.43 X 103 (Blake et al, 1967); poly(C), e268 = 6.30 X 103 (Wang & Kallenbach, 1971); poly[d(A-T)], e260 (= e262) = 6.65 X 103 (Inman & Baldwin, 1962); inactive yeast tRNA)6U, <258 = 7.48 X 103, which was calculated from a molecular weight of 29500 (based on its sequence; Kowalski et al, 1971) and a e2581% of 215.5 for the inactive (formerly termed "denatured") conformer (Adams et al, 1967). Unless otherwise stated, all other chemicals utilized were of reagent or comparable grade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The free energy of a defective or mismatched structure depends on the base involved, both in polymers as well as short chains. 'Wobble' base pairs (G-U, I-U or I-A) at low concentration in a double helix tend to occupy a position within a helical segment for example, while other mismatches tend to be excluded from the helix altogether, so as to produce bulged structures similar to those illustrated above (Wang & Kallenbach, 1971).…”
Section: Tjn)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…poly(rU) would involve a swinging out of U, such that the strong stacking of A within the duplex is preserved. The energetics of internal defects in double helices have been investigated using synthetic oligonucleotides with appropriate mismatching (Gralla & Crothers, 1973), or polymers containing similar mispairing (Wang & Kallenbach, 1971;Lomant & Fresco, 1975). Either model system suggests that, in contrast to the simple opening of a base pair at the end of a helix, opening at internal sites is energetically less favourable.…”
Section: (762) a Minimal Opening Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%