2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(02)03008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helicity dependence of the γ→p→→nπ+π0 reaction in the second resonance region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table III, this procedure yields a multi-pion contribution of (20 ± 2) µb to the GDH sum rule. On the other hand, we have evaluated this contribution on the basis of recently published data for the helicity dependence of the γp → Nππ channels in the energy range 325 MeV < E γ < 800 MeV [37][38][39].…”
Section: B Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table III, this procedure yields a multi-pion contribution of (20 ± 2) µb to the GDH sum rule. On the other hand, we have evaluated this contribution on the basis of recently published data for the helicity dependence of the γp → Nππ channels in the energy range 325 MeV < E γ < 800 MeV [37][38][39].…”
Section: B Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a more demanding test to the model can be done by evaluating polarization observables, since it can be sensible to details of the model not visible when integrating over polarization degrees of freedom in the unpolarized observables. In this line, a test of the model of [15] was done in [22] when evaluating the spin 1/2 and 3/2 amplitudes and the contribution to the GDH sum rule of the double pion channel, in fair agreement with Mainz results [23,24], and the evaluation of beam asymmetries under experimental study at GRAAL [5]. These observables are based on differences of total differential cross sections dependent on polarization, which provide a valuable information on the internal dynamics of the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The theoretical predictions are shown by the solid lines [55], dashed lines [68], and dotted lines [69]. The data are from MAMI [67].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is experimental proof that twopion production can not be simply explained by a resonance driven mechanism (s-channel contribution), but that it requires large non-resonant effects such as Born terms and vector meson exchange in the t-channel. The channels nπ + π 0 , pπ + π − , and pπ 0 π 0 were separately analyzed in the MAMI experiment [67]. As an example we show the cross section for γ p → nπ + π 0 in Figure 6.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%