2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-021-2242-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helium and Hamiltonian delay equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: That q 1 is constant in the case r = 1 is proved in [5,Lemma 3.1]. It suffices therefore to consider the case r < 1.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof: That q 1 is constant in the case r = 1 is proved in [5,Lemma 3.1]. It suffices therefore to consider the case r < 1.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to get a more tractable system the author replaced in [5] the instantaneous interaction of the two electrons by a mean interaction. It turns out that for mean interaction between the electrons the outer electron is really frozen, i.e., it becomes stationary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where µ > 1. This functional describes two electrons attracted by a nucleus of charge µ and interacting with each other by their mean position, see [5].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this note is to introduce a class of Hamiltonian delay equations for which such a uniform bound on the nullity still holds although the problems are in general not local. The author discovered this kind of equations in connection with his study on Helium [5]. The idea is to study particles which interact with each other just through their orbits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%