2008
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889808024643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helium cryostat synchrotron charge densities determined using a large CCD detector – the upgraded beamline D3 at DESY

Abstract: Dedicated to the recently deceased Professor Niels Kristian Hansen in honour of his many seminal contributions to the X-ray chargedensity field.A 165 mm Mar CCD detector has been fitted on a large Huber four-circle diffractometer together with a helium cryostat at beamline D3 at Hasylab, DESY in Hamburg. This setup allows fast collection of accurate, shortwavelength, very low temperature X-ray diffraction data for charge-density analysis. As a test example, diffraction data have been collected in 10 h on a hyd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the ADPs serve as a bin for uncorrected systematic errors in the experiments, and hence inaccurate data tend to show higher deviation between X‐ray and neutron ADPs 66. Comparing the ADPs of the 33 heavy atoms in 1 by using the program UIJXN leads to a mean deviation ${\left\langle {\Delta U} \right\rangle }$ of 0.00058 Å 2 ,67 which, for such a large system, is an excellent correspondence compared with other X/N studies 68. The hydrogen nuclear positions and ADPs, which are important in accurate ED modeling of hydrogen‐bonded systems such as 1 ,69 were therefore expected to be of excellent quality.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In general, the ADPs serve as a bin for uncorrected systematic errors in the experiments, and hence inaccurate data tend to show higher deviation between X‐ray and neutron ADPs 66. Comparing the ADPs of the 33 heavy atoms in 1 by using the program UIJXN leads to a mean deviation ${\left\langle {\Delta U} \right\rangle }$ of 0.00058 Å 2 ,67 which, for such a large system, is an excellent correspondence compared with other X/N studies 68. The hydrogen nuclear positions and ADPs, which are important in accurate ED modeling of hydrogen‐bonded systems such as 1 ,69 were therefore expected to be of excellent quality.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…To our knowledge, Iversen et al (1996) were the first to demonstrate explicitly that, if low research papers 362 Silvia C. Capelli et al Hirshfeld atom refinement temperatures are used and if one is careful with the data analysis, then quantitative agreement between X-ray and neutron diffraction ADPs can be achieved for non-H atoms. In a recent update of this work similar conclusions were reached (Morgenroth et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, several of the values listed by Morgenroth et al (2008) are based on studies in which H-atom positions and ADPs were fixed to values derived from neutron experiments. By contrast, in this study all parameters are derived from the X-ray data only and without constraints to the neutron experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…certainly larger than for standard charge density models, though not unusual for synchrotron data collections (see Morgenroth et al, 2008). On the other hand, analysis of the residual electron densities is quite promising.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For this reason, it is expected that the precision of the measurements is significantly lower than in standard charge density data collections. In addition, for synchrotron data collections, it is rather normal to obtain larger R int values (see, for example, Morgenroth et al, 2008), due to beam instabilities and other effects that may compromise a perfect reproducibility. This suggests that a large redundancy is a must in order to mediate all the effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%