1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00122-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helix unwinding in the effector region of elongation factor EF-Tu–GDP

Abstract: EF-Tu undergoes major conformational changes upon GTP hydrolysis. Unlike other GTP-binding proteins, EF-Tu exhibits a dramatic conformational change in the effector region, involving an unwinding of a small helix and the formation of a beta hairpin structure. This change is presumably involved in triggering the release of tRNA, and EF-Tu, from the ribosome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
218
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(43 reference statements)
5
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is confirmed by x-ray structural analysis (45)(46)(47). Because the C-domain of eRF3 is homologous to eEF1〈, it was speculated that the nucleotidedependent conformational change also occurs in the C-terminal region of eRF3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This finding is confirmed by x-ray structural analysis (45)(46)(47). Because the C-domain of eRF3 is homologous to eEF1〈, it was speculated that the nucleotidedependent conformational change also occurs in the C-terminal region of eRF3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Our data show that this EF-Tu structure indeed corresponds to an activated state for the hydrolysis of the nucleotide, as detailed below. Several conserved regions playing prominent roles in the working cycle of GTPases, namely switch I (EF-Tu residues 40-62; E. coli numbering is used throughout this article), switch II (80-100) and P loop (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), are found to undergo characteristic conformational changes in EF-Tu. We describe these changes in the context of the ribosome-bound state of EF-Tu captured by the map.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other wing of the hydrophobic gate (Ile-60) is part of switch I (also known as effector loop), which assumes an ␣-helix conformation in the closed form of EF-Tu and changes to a ␤-hairpin conformation in the open form (17,18). The large flexibility of this region has prevented switch I from being resolved in EM density maps and some crystallographic structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, the C-terminal part of this region is a -hairpin, whereas in the latter it forms an R-helix. 31 This means that upon GTP binding, Thr62, which is exposed to the solvent in the GDP form (reference distances from OG1 of this residue to magnesium ion are 18.4 and 16.9 Å in EF1A‚GDP and eEF1A‚GDP: eEF1BR complexes, respectively), gets involved in the coordination of the Mg 2+ ion by means of its hydroxyl oxygen because the conserved sequence 60-GITI-63 ( Figure 5) comes close to both the phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) and helix B. Another consequence of exchanging GDP with GTP is that the conserved Ile61 gets close to Val20 in the P-loop in such a way that both residues form a "hydrophobic gate" that could be important for GTP hydrolysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%