2009
DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00113-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemagglutination Test for Rapid Serodiagnosis of Human Pythiosis

Abstract: Human pythiosis is an emerging, life-threatening infectious disease, caused by the oomycete Pythium insidiosum. Thailand is an area where human pythiosis is endemic and the genetic blood disorder thalassemia is a predisposing factor. Patients with pythiosis present with arterial occlusions of the lower extremities, corneal ulcers, or chronic cutaneous infections. Diagnosis relies on time-consuming, relatively insensitive tests such as culture identification and immunodiffusion assay. Most patients undergo surg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic peptides s74-1 and s74-2 were each used to coat ELISA plates and tested against the serum samples from patients with pythiosis (samples T1 to T5) and controls (samples C1 to C5). Among the pythiosis sera, pythiosis serum samples T1 (hemagglutination [HA] titer [12] ϭ 1:5,120) and T5 (HA titer ϭ 1:40,960) gave remarkably high ELISA signals (1.2 and 0.8, respectively, for s74-1; 1.2 and 1.0, respectively, for s74-2), while pythiosis serum samples T2 (HA titer ϭ 1:2,560), T3 (HA titer ϭ 1:1,280), and T4 (HA titer ϭ 1:1,280) gave weak to moderate ELISA signals (0.4, 0.3, and 0.3, respectively, for s74-1; 0.5, 0.4, and 0.3, respectively, for s74-2). In general, the s74-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Synthetic peptides s74-1 and s74-2 were each used to coat ELISA plates and tested against the serum samples from patients with pythiosis (samples T1 to T5) and controls (samples C1 to C5). Among the pythiosis sera, pythiosis serum samples T1 (hemagglutination [HA] titer [12] ϭ 1:5,120) and T5 (HA titer ϭ 1:40,960) gave remarkably high ELISA signals (1.2 and 0.8, respectively, for s74-1; 1.2 and 1.0, respectively, for s74-2), while pythiosis serum samples T2 (HA titer ϭ 1:2,560), T3 (HA titer ϭ 1:1,280), and T4 (HA titer ϭ 1:1,280) gave weak to moderate ELISA signals (0.4, 0.3, and 0.3, respectively, for s74-1; 0.5, 0.4, and 0.3, respectively, for s74-2). In general, the s74-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each new antigen preparation, the assay protocol needs extensive reevaluation in regards to antigen concentration, the optimal dilution of the serum samples, cutoff points, and the effective concentration of other reagents before it is suitable for clinical use. In addition, recent reports of false-positive results for some diagnostic tests (12,15) indicate a problem regarding the specificity of detection of the crude extract antigen. Taken together, these complications indicate an ongoing need for a more reliable and specific antigen source for the development of serological assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current diagnostic modalities, including culture identification (9)(10)(11), serodiagnosis (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), and molecular-based detection (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), are fraught with problems. For example, culture identification is time-consuming and often fails to grow and to identify the organism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even isolating the organism in pure culture does not guarantee an accurate identification: the procedure is both time-consuming and technically challenging, and the organism may fail to generate characteristic zoospores when cultured in vitro (3,6). Serological methods have been described, including complement fixation, immunodiffusion, fluorescent antibody tests, immunoblots, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and hemagglutinin tests (8). However, these techniques display variable sensitivity and specificity, especially during early infection when the immune response is not fully mounted (8).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological methods have been described, including complement fixation, immunodiffusion, fluorescent antibody tests, immunoblots, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and hemagglutinin tests (8). However, these techniques display variable sensitivity and specificity, especially during early infection when the immune response is not fully mounted (8). Definitive diagnosis can be achieved using molecular methods, including species-specific nested PCR (3) or DNA sequencing of variable regions (1,2).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%