2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hematology from embryo to adult in the bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus): Differential effects in the adult of clutch, sex and hypoxic incubation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the blood chemistry or hematological variables measured in the offspring population varied significantly between experimental groups (Table 1). With exception of PO 2 and PCO 2 values that were associated with Tb of the hatchling, none of the variables were associated with the covariates for any of the hematological variables (the random effect of week of collection was not statistically significant, P > 0.05), with the exception of Osm (P < 0.002), Noteworthy is the fact that the values obtained in this study for the king quail fall within the ranges previously reported for hatchlings of the bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), the common quail (Coturnix coturnix), and the chicken (Gallus gallus; Burggren and Elmonoufy, 2017;Flores-Santin et al, 2018;Amaral-Silva et al, 2020). Similarly, none of the organ masses significantly differed between hatchlings from the Control, Low or High oil-exposed parental groups (Table 2) and, for none of the organ masses when the random effect of week of collection was included, with the exception of gut mass (P < 0.002).…”
Section: Blood Chemistry and Hematological Variables And Organ Massessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…None of the blood chemistry or hematological variables measured in the offspring population varied significantly between experimental groups (Table 1). With exception of PO 2 and PCO 2 values that were associated with Tb of the hatchling, none of the variables were associated with the covariates for any of the hematological variables (the random effect of week of collection was not statistically significant, P > 0.05), with the exception of Osm (P < 0.002), Noteworthy is the fact that the values obtained in this study for the king quail fall within the ranges previously reported for hatchlings of the bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), the common quail (Coturnix coturnix), and the chicken (Gallus gallus; Burggren and Elmonoufy, 2017;Flores-Santin et al, 2018;Amaral-Silva et al, 2020). Similarly, none of the organ masses significantly differed between hatchlings from the Control, Low or High oil-exposed parental groups (Table 2) and, for none of the organ masses when the random effect of week of collection was included, with the exception of gut mass (P < 0.002).…”
Section: Blood Chemistry and Hematological Variables And Organ Massessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…After light anesthesia using 1.5% of halothane in ambient air via face mask for <2 min (Flores‐Santin et al 2018), 300 µL of arterial blood was collected from the ulnar artery using a 1‐mL heparinized syringe and transferred to a 1.5‐mL vial. Immediately after collection, 120 µL of blood was transferred to a blood gas analyzer (ABL TH 5 Radiometer; Medical A/S) for determination of partial pressure of O 2 (PO 2 ), partial pressure of CO 2 (PCO 2 ), pH, and bicarbonate concentration ([HCO 3 − ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup of the study is ‘translated’ into the model as follows: individuals reach puberty sometime before the start of the experiment, presumably when they are roughly 100 days old (assumption based on Flores-Santin et al , 2018 ). After this, we assume they immediately start investing energy into the reproduction buffer ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$E_R$\end{document} ) at a rate \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\dot {p}_R$\end{document} ( Kooijman, 2010 ), but this does not yet result in laid eggs (birds did not start laying eggs in Flores-Santin et al , 2018 ). Based on the data, we set the start of ingestion up-regulation as being 25 days before the start of egg-laying; during this period, we assume that the reproductive organs prepare (enlarge) ( Cain & Lien, 1985 , Vezina & Salvante, 2010 ), after which eggs are released.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%