2002
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.3c.1292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemispheric Asymmetry in Accessing Word Meanings: Concrete and Abstract Nouns

Abstract: The present experiments investigated hemispheric differences in the brain in accessing concrete and abstract word meanings. For this purpose, an automatic semantic priming paradigm was used with a short stimulus onset asynchrony between prime and target (250 msec.) as well as a low proportion of related trials (20%). Analysis showed that for concrete nouns, priming effects were observed in both hemispheres. There was greater priming in the right hemisphere, suggesting hemispheric differences in accessing seman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several neuroimaging studies have shown that for the native language abstract and concrete nouns have partially different representations in the brain [e.g., Hoffman et al, ; Huang et al, ; Klostermann et al, ; Lehmann et al, ; Wang et al, ; Weiss and Rappelsberger, ; Zhang et al, ]. Such dissociation between representations of abstract and concrete nouns is also supported by findings in patients with brain lesions [Cousins et al, ; Martensson et al, ; see Shallice and Cooper, , for a review] and in healthy participants [Fernandino et al, ; Shibahara and Wagoner, ; Vigliocco et al, ]. This dissociation was also found in a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study [Papagno et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several neuroimaging studies have shown that for the native language abstract and concrete nouns have partially different representations in the brain [e.g., Hoffman et al, ; Huang et al, ; Klostermann et al, ; Lehmann et al, ; Wang et al, ; Weiss and Rappelsberger, ; Zhang et al, ]. Such dissociation between representations of abstract and concrete nouns is also supported by findings in patients with brain lesions [Cousins et al, ; Martensson et al, ; see Shallice and Cooper, , for a review] and in healthy participants [Fernandino et al, ; Shibahara and Wagoner, ; Vigliocco et al, ]. This dissociation was also found in a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study [Papagno et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, they produce shorter RTs for concrete words than abstract words when asked to generate mental imagery [ 73 ]. The dual coding theory has received empirical support from visual field studies which demonstrate that concrete words presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere, which is dominant for visual processing) are processed faster than those presented to the right visual field [ 74 75 ]. Imaging studies also provide support for the dual coding theory as areas involved in perception and imagery have more activation for concrete compared to abstract words [ 76 77 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater activation was observed in the lower left and right parietal lobes as well as in the left inferior frontal lobe during the processing of concrete words compared to abstract words. Shibahara and Lucero-Wagoner (2002) detected greater priming in the right hemisphere for concrete words but same priming as those in the left hemisphere for abstract words, which suggests that abstract words presented to the right hemisphere may be transferred to the left hemisphere which has processing advantages in verbal coding. The findings of Gullick, et al's (2013) event-related potential (ERP) study, which measures brain responses to direct stimuli of a sensory, cognitive, or motor event, were in line with the dual coding theory in terms of concrete words benefit from greater activation in both verbal and nonverbal systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%