2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70890-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemispheric Specialization for Language in Children with Different Types of Specific Language Impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, during project therapy children worked on monitoring their level of comprehension and seeking clarification, and on understanding the meanings of words, grammar and narrative sequences, and there was the possibility that this would alter their language comprehension scores. However, the results revealed this did not occur to a significant extent and there are implications for the need to identify effective interventions for children with a receptive component to their primary language difficulties, in the light of emerging evidence for a distinctive aetiology in regard to lower heritability and the involvement of more generalised processing deficits relative to specific expressive delay, [174][175][176] and in view of the poorer long-term outcomes and of the more persistent nature of mixed receptive-expressive impairment. 37,42,[177][178][179][180][181] The children in the present study with specific expressive delay had higher expressive and receptive language scores on average at T1 compared with the children with mixed receptive-expressive delay and made significantly greater progress, providing further evidence that the improvements in their scores following intervention cannot be accounted for merely by regression to the mean.…”
Section: Findings In the Context Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nonetheless, during project therapy children worked on monitoring their level of comprehension and seeking clarification, and on understanding the meanings of words, grammar and narrative sequences, and there was the possibility that this would alter their language comprehension scores. However, the results revealed this did not occur to a significant extent and there are implications for the need to identify effective interventions for children with a receptive component to their primary language difficulties, in the light of emerging evidence for a distinctive aetiology in regard to lower heritability and the involvement of more generalised processing deficits relative to specific expressive delay, [174][175][176] and in view of the poorer long-term outcomes and of the more persistent nature of mixed receptive-expressive impairment. 37,42,[177][178][179][180][181] The children in the present study with specific expressive delay had higher expressive and receptive language scores on average at T1 compared with the children with mixed receptive-expressive delay and made significantly greater progress, providing further evidence that the improvements in their scores following intervention cannot be accounted for merely by regression to the mean.…”
Section: Findings In the Context Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Reduced left lateralization or rightward asymmetry of language functions have also been reported in healthy left-handers (see Geschwind & Galaburda, 1985; Jorgens et al, 2007; Knecht et al, 2000; Pujol et al, 1999; Szaflarski et al, 2002; Tzourio et al, 1998a) and in a number of other disorders, including developmental stuttering, dyslexia, specific language impairment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and schizophrenia (Blomgren et al, 2003; Geschwind & Galaburda, 1985; Pecini et al, 2005; Wehner et al, 2007). These complex neurodevelopmental disorders, which share increased rates of atypical lateralization of language, all have heterogeneous co-morbid behavioral characteristics, with overlapping subgroups often identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Atypical lateralization in persons with ASD and person with typical development may lead to decreased hemispheric specialization, which may affect highly lateralized tasks, such as language ability. Additionally, it is interesting to note that atypical asymmetry of language (as measured by functional activation during language tasks) has been reported in typically developing left-handed individuals [Jorgens, Kleiser, Indefrey, & Seitz, 2007;Tzourio, Crivello, Mellet, Nkanga-Ngila, & Mazoyer, 1998], as well as in individuals with reading disorders [Wehner, Ahlfors, & Mody, 2007], developmental stuttering [Blomgren, Nagarajan, Lee, Li, & Alvord, 2003], specific language impairment [Pecini et al, 2005], attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [Hale et al, 2010;Keune et al, 2011], and schizophrenia [Sommer, Ramsey, Kahn, Aleman, & Bouma, 2001]. These disorders may have behavioral symptoms that overlap with ASD, which makes this an intriguing area of study.…”
Section: Atypical Lateralization In Persons With Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%