2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.127303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemispherical power asymmetry from a space-dependent component of the adiabatic power spectrum

Abstract: The hemispherical power asymmetry observed by Planck and WMAP can be interpreted as due to a spatially-varying and scale-dependent component of the adiabatic power spectrum. We derive general constraints on the magnitude and scale-dependence of a component with a dipole spatial variation. The spectral index and the running of the spectral index can be significantly shifted from their inflation model values, resulting in a smaller spectral index and a more positive running. A key prediction is a hemispherical a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper bound on α, implied from the lack of dipole asymmetry on quasar scales from the findings of [27,28], is α = −0.56. We choose this upper bound for studying this shape.…”
Section: Asymmetry From Adiabatic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The upper bound on α, implied from the lack of dipole asymmetry on quasar scales from the findings of [27,28], is α = −0.56. We choose this upper bound for studying this shape.…”
Section: Asymmetry From Adiabatic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[64]) have questioned the significance of the power asymmetry on small scales, it is a persistent anomaly on large scales. There are many suggestions [65][66][67][68][69][70] as to how such an asymmetry might arise, and we study the possibility of the power asymmetry resulting from having more structure in the primordial power spectrum (PPS) in one hemisphere compared to the other.…”
Section: Hemispherical Power Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the step function forms for A ζ and C ζ that I am adopting, [23,24] takes A ζ ∝ C ζ ∝ k −n . To get sufficient suppression on scales k −1 < x ls /60 one needs n > 0.56, but this also causes strong scale dependence on scales k −1 > x ls /60.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%