2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2588-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb shows a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality in ICU patients with septic shock: a propensity-score-weighted retrospective study

Abstract: Background and aims Innovative treatment modalities have not yet shown a clinical benefit in patients with septic shock. To reduce severe cytokinaemia, CytoSorb as an add-on to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) showed promising results in case reports. However, there are no clinical trials investigating outcomes. Methods In this investigator-initiated retrospective study, patients with septic shock were treated with CRRT + CytoSorb (n = 67) or CRRT alone (n = 49). The primary outcome was the 28-day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
174
2
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
174
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree however that because of the retrospective nature of our study, a human factor cannot be completely eradicated. Yet, by applying the "inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)" method, the patient characteristics at the start of therapy are comparable as shown in Table 1 and by the supplementary figure [1,2,4,5].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We agree however that because of the retrospective nature of our study, a human factor cannot be completely eradicated. Yet, by applying the "inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)" method, the patient characteristics at the start of therapy are comparable as shown in Table 1 and by the supplementary figure [1,2,4,5].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propensity score (i.e., the probability of being treated, given the set of confounders) is constructed and used as a weighting factor in order to create a comparable set of patients. This means that, after applying the weights, the distribution of the patient characteristics at the start of therapy is now independent of the treatment assignment, such as is the case in a randomized controlled trial [1,2,4,5].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations