2015
DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodialysis graft-induced intracranial hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there are only 13 reported cases of AV accessinduced intracranial hypertension in the English literature. 1 Central venous stenosis is a common complication seen in end-stage renal disease patients maintained on hemodialysis. Central venous stenosis is usually secondary to previous central venous catheters and the turbulent flow from the AV access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To date, there are only 13 reported cases of AV accessinduced intracranial hypertension in the English literature. 1 Central venous stenosis is a common complication seen in end-stage renal disease patients maintained on hemodialysis. Central venous stenosis is usually secondary to previous central venous catheters and the turbulent flow from the AV access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high venous pressure arising from the shunted blood impairs the reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid across the arachnoid villi, leading to high cerebrospinal fluid pressure. 1 The anatomic requirements for this to occur are as follows. First, the location of the outflow stenosis or occlusion must affect the brachiocephalic vein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A review of the literature yielded at least 15 publications reporting neurological signs and symptoms related to venous hypertension caused by altered cervical and cerebral blood flow from central vein access for hemodialysis. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Most of these cases clinically manifested with visual changes and papilledema suggesting a more typical presentation of elevated intracranial pressure, while others presented in a manner similar to our patient with seizures, hemorrhages, ischemic events, and encephalopathy. The time from venous access placement to onset of symptoms was extremely variable, suggesting that this condition needs to be considered in patients with such venous access regardless of when the procedure was performed as long as it is still patent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%