2011
DOI: 10.1002/lt.22304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic consequences of spontaneous splenorenal shunts in deceased donor liver transplantation

Abstract: The presence of large spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRSs) is a risk factor for poor portal vein flow and liver dysfunction. The disconnection of splenorenal shunts by left renal vein (LRV) ligation has been suggested as a potential solution for improving portal flow. We reviewed the hemodynamic consequences of splenorenal shunts in deceased donor liver transplantation and investigated the role of LRV ligation. In 10 patients who underwent liver transplantation at our institution between January 2006 and Apr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that series, portal vein flow less than 1200 mL/min in the allograft after reperfusion raised concern for portal hypoperfusion, necessitating intervention. 4 Ligation of the LRV may be more appealing than ligation of the SRS itself, as the varix is very thin-walled and inadvertent damage could precipitate dramatic blood loss. Additionally, it has been well established that LRV ligation is a good surgical option and does not negatively affect renal function.…”
Section: Intraoperative Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that series, portal vein flow less than 1200 mL/min in the allograft after reperfusion raised concern for portal hypoperfusion, necessitating intervention. 4 Ligation of the LRV may be more appealing than ligation of the SRS itself, as the varix is very thin-walled and inadvertent damage could precipitate dramatic blood loss. Additionally, it has been well established that LRV ligation is a good surgical option and does not negatively affect renal function.…”
Section: Intraoperative Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SRS) forms between the splenic vein and the left renal vein ( Figures 1A and B) and has been noted in up to one-fifth of patients evaluated for liver transplant. [1][2][3][4] As the degree of cirrhosis progresses, higher resistance in the liver vascular bed can lead to considerable shunting of portal blood into the left renal vein. This causes the splenorenal shunt to become a high-flow collateral and ultimately can result in significant vascular steal from the transplanted liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A splenorenal shunt (SRS) is a collateral vessel detected at the splenic hilum in patients with portal hypertension [8]. It is one of several spontaneous shunts, which may be created by reopening the embryonic venous route [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it has been suggested that large splenorenal shunts may be a risk factor for PVT since its presence would decrease portal flow after LT and promote portal occlusion. 9,10 For that reason, if a large splenorenal shunt is present in an LT candidate, as in our case, its ligation could be beneficial. Shunt ligation is not associated with any detrimental effects on either hepatic or renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Shunt ligation is not associated with any detrimental effects on either hepatic or renal function. 10 However, whether these shunts should be routinely closed during LT needs to be further studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%