1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02007000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic Effects of Primary Closure Versus Patch Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple comparative reviews have failed to demonstrate a consistent difference in outcomes with either technique compared with the other. [395][396][397][398][399][400][401][402][403][404][405] One report involved a single experienced surgeon and a series of patients who required staged bilateral CEA in whom 1 side was randomly allocated to primary closure and the other side to patch angioplasty. 406 Patch angioplasty was associated with lower 30-day surgical morbidity and mortality and fewer cases of residual or recurrent stenosis as assessed by periodic duplex scanning for up to 1 year postoperatively.…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple comparative reviews have failed to demonstrate a consistent difference in outcomes with either technique compared with the other. [395][396][397][398][399][400][401][402][403][404][405] One report involved a single experienced surgeon and a series of patients who required staged bilateral CEA in whom 1 side was randomly allocated to primary closure and the other side to patch angioplasty. 406 Patch angioplasty was associated with lower 30-day surgical morbidity and mortality and fewer cases of residual or recurrent stenosis as assessed by periodic duplex scanning for up to 1 year postoperatively.…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence comparing repair of a canine common carotid artery with primary closure, a 5mm patch or a 10mm patch demonstrated different geometry and more disturbed haemodynamics with the larger patch 9 . This may cause flow recirculation and platelet aggregation, 18 which may result in peri-operative embolic events and occlusion as well as contributing to late restenosis through neointimal hyperplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no detailed information on the indications for patch angioplasty, nor the patch material or size. Experimental evidence has suggested that patch width affects geometry and haemodynamics following surgery, which may influence clinical outcomes 9,10 . The aim of this questionnaire-based study was to further explore the indications and techniques of patching after CEA adopted by vascular surgeons across Great Britain and Ireland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of patch closure is visual confirmation of complete plaque removal, but the disadvantage is the greater length of time required for closure. Multiple comparative reviews have failed to demonstrate a consistent difference in outcomes with either technique compared with the other (395)(396)(397)(398)(399)(400)(401)(402)(403)(404)(405). One report involved a single experienced surgeon and a series of patients who required staged bilateral CEA in whom 1 side was randomly allocated to primary closure and the other side to patch angioplasty (406).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%