2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00227-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic profiles during piggyback liver grafts using arterial or portal revascularization1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial reperfusion with portal vein leads to higher values of preload parameters (CVP and mean pulmonary and wedge pressures) and, thus, higher cardiac output and mean systemic arterial pressure values than initial reperfusion of the graft with the hepatic artery. Durcef et al8 found similar results at the first reperfusion, but gave no information about the second unclamping. Nevertheless, hemodynamic and metabolic changes could have occurred on the second vascularization of the graft, as occurred in our study (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial reperfusion with portal vein leads to higher values of preload parameters (CVP and mean pulmonary and wedge pressures) and, thus, higher cardiac output and mean systemic arterial pressure values than initial reperfusion of the graft with the hepatic artery. Durcef et al8 found similar results at the first reperfusion, but gave no information about the second unclamping. Nevertheless, hemodynamic and metabolic changes could have occurred on the second vascularization of the graft, as occurred in our study (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As far as we know, few controlled studies comparing the hemodynamic effects of the order of graft revascularization have been performed. One study by a French group8 and 1 by a Scottish group have been published,9 but their data were inconclusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 11 studies could be included. Initial artery reperfusion versus initial portal reperfusion Six studies were included in this comparison: three randomized [1,23,4], two prospective nonrandomized [25,26] and one retrospective study [27]. Meta-analysis of the four included studies did not reveal evidence in favour of a specific reperfusion technique.…”
Section: Results Of the Literature Search And Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prolongation of warm ischaemia time and the anhepatic phase with SIMR may impair the graft function [3]. In the systematic review of Gurusamy et al [11], only five randomized controlled trial were included [1,10,23,24,28]. The comparisons performed included IAR vs. IPR, SIMR vs. IPR and RETR vs. SIMR.…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prefer to do the arterial anastomosis first and then the portal anastomosis and to perform simultaneous arterial and portal revascularisation of the graft. Although some studies have suggested some advantages with initial arterial revascularisation [23], further studies are needed to confirm these findings.…”
Section: Vascular Anastomosesmentioning
confidence: 99%