1988
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.3.630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamics in humans during conventional and experimental methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Abstract: High-fidelity hemodynamic recordings of aortic and right atrial pressures and the coronary perfusion gradient (the difference between aortic and atrial pressure) were

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Models indicate that the optimum duty cycle for coronary flow is about 30-40%,10 consistent with results observed in humans. 21 The higher coronary flow with 30% duty cycle in our study agrees with this prediction. …”
Section: Intrathoracic Compression Pressures and Chest Geometrysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Models indicate that the optimum duty cycle for coronary flow is about 30-40%,10 consistent with results observed in humans. 21 The higher coronary flow with 30% duty cycle in our study agrees with this prediction. …”
Section: Intrathoracic Compression Pressures and Chest Geometrysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…One reason for this is that breath-stacking occurs when ventilation is as rapid as typical compression rates. This elevates Ppl and Pra during the release phase [100], and impedes venous return. Such breath-stacking is inevitable despite the forced expiration caused by chest compression, because expiration is flow-limited.…”
Section: Steady-state Effects Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rate of at least 100 compressions per minutes. Some clinical trials and laboratory studies have shown that highfrequency CCs (120-150/min) improves hemodynamics compared to standard CCs, (8)(9)(10)(11) while other clinical and laboratory studies have found no effect of high-frequency CC and no improvement in hemodynamics over standard CPR. (12)(13)(14) Some authors have shown that even well trained paramedics tend to perform CCs faster than the appropriate frequency, (1) which may result in insufficient coronary perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%