2013
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v4.i3.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemoglobin A1c in early postpartum screening of women with gestational diabetes

Abstract: HbA1c level ≥ 48 mmol/mol (≥ 6.5%) has reasonable sensitivity and high specificity in comparison to OGTT for early postpartum screening of diabetes in GDM. At 6(th) week postpartum screening, if FBG is normal and HbA1c < 44 mmol/mol OGTT is not recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Katreddy et al. reported a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 99% (AUC 0.98) in the diagnosis of diabetes, although the sensitivity of HbA1c ≥6.0% (≥42 mmol/mol) for detecting abnormal glucose tolerance was low (28%) [20] . Another study by Kim et al., based on a small group of women who had had GDM, found a sensitivity 65% and a specificity 68% for HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (≥39 mmol/mol) in detection of abnormal glucose tolerance [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Katreddy et al. reported a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 99% (AUC 0.98) in the diagnosis of diabetes, although the sensitivity of HbA1c ≥6.0% (≥42 mmol/mol) for detecting abnormal glucose tolerance was low (28%) [20] . Another study by Kim et al., based on a small group of women who had had GDM, found a sensitivity 65% and a specificity 68% for HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (≥39 mmol/mol) in detection of abnormal glucose tolerance [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Easy, cost-effective, and less time-consuming screening strategies are required to capture as many women as possible who are at risk of type-2 diabetes. In this context, the HbA1c test appears to be attractive and its validity as a screening tool for abnormal glucose metabolism after GDM has only been examined in a few studies, with somewhat conflicting results 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although HbA 1c is not currently recommended for the screening of glucose intolerance in post‐partum women with GDM, several studies have evaluated HbA 1c as a screening test for undiagnosed pre‐diabetes or diabetes . Some authors have suggested that HbA 1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) had reasonable sensitivity (71.4%) and high specificity (98.5%) for early post‐partum screening of diabetes in 203 women with GDM at 6 weeks post‐partum . In another study conducted between 6 weeks and 36 months post‐partum, HbA 1c ≥ 39 mmol/mol (5.7%) had 65% sensitivity and 68% specificity for identifying abnormal glucose tolerance in 54 women with histories of GDM .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HbA 1c has several advantages over fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and OGTT, including greater convenience (fasting not required), greater pre‐analytical stability and fewer day‐to‐day variations due to stress and illness . Several studies have suggested that using HbA 1c might improve the post‐partum testing rate for women with GDM . However, the usefulness of HbA 1c for the reassessment of glycaemic status in post‐partum women with a history of GDM remains controversial because, in previous studies, post‐partum evaluations have been performed at various times from 6 weeks to 3 years .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be benefits from screening at risk women for diabetes before they conceive.In recent years the WHO have advised that a glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level can be measured to diagnose diabetes, replacing the oral glucose tolerance (OGT) test which takes 2 hours and requires the patient to fast. One of the advantages of the HbA1c is it can be taken with routine bloods and a level above 6.5% confirms the diagnosis of diabetes [39,40]. Could this be a quick screening tool?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%