Hémorragies intrapulmonaires associées à une maladie de Basedow

Nguyen, Tommy; Gest, V; Galezowski, N; Blanche, P.; Got, D; Reumont, G

doi:10.1016/0248-8663(96)88124-0

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The corals Montastraea cavernosa , Mussismilia hispida and Siderastrea spp. are the most abundant reef builders on TSB coral reefs [ 36 ] and it is known that in the Caribbean the cleaner fish Elacatinus pallens and E . pilepis prefer microhabitats provided by Montastraea and Siderastrea [ 91 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…tuberculosa in some reef areas may be related to nutrient input from terrestrially derived river run-off. Costa et al [ 36 ], in their review article of the role of nutrient overloading on Brazilian coral reefs, also mention how Palythoa benefits from nitrification enrichment in coastal reefs. Despite heavy impacts some reefs in TSB still have a coral cover considered high for the region (between 8% and 27% c .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Phase Shift from Corals to Zoantharia on Reef Fish Assemblages

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consequences of reef phase shifts on fish communities remain poorly understood. Studies on the causes, effects and consequences of phase shifts on reef fish communities have only been considered for coral-to-macroalgae shifts. Therefore, there is a large information gap regarding the consequences of novel phase shifts and how these kinds of phase shifts impact on fish assemblages. This study aimed to compare the fish assemblages on reefs under normal conditions (relatively high cover of corals) to those which have shifted to a dominance of the zoantharian Palythoa cf. variabilis on coral reefs in Todos os Santos Bay (TSB), Brazilian eastern coast. We examined eight reefs, where we estimated cover of corals and P. cf. variabilis and coral reef fish richness, abundance and body size. Fish richness differed significantly between normal reefs (48 species) and phase-shift reefs (38 species), a 20% reduction in species. However there was no difference in fish abundance between normal and phase shift reefs. One fish species, Chaetodon striatus, was significantly less abundant on normal reefs. The differences in fish assemblages between different reef phases was due to differences in trophic groups of fish; on normal reefs carnivorous fishes were more abundant, while on phase shift reefs mobile invertivores dominated.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%