1952
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v7.1.20.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemorrhagic Diathesis Due to a Circulating Anticoagulant Report of Case with Laboratory Observations

Abstract: 1. A case is reported of hemorrhagic diathesis in a woman in which the presence of an anticoagulant in the patient’s blood and plasma could be demonstrated. 2. The anticoagulant was shown to be active in dilutions up to 1:350. It retained its potency after heating to 61 C. for 10 minutes and after storage, either in a refrigerator or at room temperature, for twenty-four hours. 3. The anticoagulant was not neutralized by protamine sulfate or by toluidine blue. Placental plasma corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1952
1952
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…haemophilia or Christmas disease who had developed the anticoagulant following blood transfusions; 16 were in women within one year of a pregnancy; one was in a newborn infant; eight were in females unrelated to pregnancy; and 16 in nonhaemophiliac males. Most of the latter cases were associated with one or other of a variety of constitutional diseases, a list of which is given by Hougie (1955), but in a few no associated disease could be found (Joules and MacFarlane, 1938;Pons and de Torregrosa, 1952;Hougie, 1953;and others). The case reported here comes into the latter group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…haemophilia or Christmas disease who had developed the anticoagulant following blood transfusions; 16 were in women within one year of a pregnancy; one was in a newborn infant; eight were in females unrelated to pregnancy; and 16 in nonhaemophiliac males. Most of the latter cases were associated with one or other of a variety of constitutional diseases, a list of which is given by Hougie (1955), but in a few no associated disease could be found (Joules and MacFarlane, 1938;Pons and de Torregrosa, 1952;Hougie, 1953;and others). The case reported here comes into the latter group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%