Hemostatic clips and magnetic resonance imaging. Are there any compatibility issues?

Mavrogenis, Georgios; Natale, Milena Del

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344404

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Resolution clip is known to have the longest attachment, lasting up to 5 weeks in 100% (5/5) of animals studied . Cases of endoscopic hemostatic clips retained years after placement have been reported but are rare …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MRI safety and devices: An update and expert consensus

Maralani

Schieda

Hecht

et al. 2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing globally, and MRI safety issues regarding medical devices, which are constantly being developed or upgraded, represent an ongoing challenge for MRI personnel. To assist the MRI community, a panel of 10 radiologists with expertise in MRI safety from nine high‐volume academic centers formed, with the objective of providing clarity on some of the MRI safety issues for the 10 most frequently questioned devices. Ten device categories were identified. The panel reviewed the literature, including key MRI safety issues regarding screening and adverse event reports, in addition to the manufacturer's Instructions For Use. Using a Delphi‐inspired method, 36 practical recommendations were generated with 100% consensus that can aid the clinical MRI community. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:657–674.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%