1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01099916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Henry's law coefficients for aqueous solutions of acetone, acetaldehyde and acetonitrile, and equilibrium constants for the addition compounds of acetone and acetaldehyde with bisulfite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 5, the temperature dependence of the HLC of acetaldehyde, measured using the standard experimental parameters, is compared to available data from the literature for the temperature range of 4 • C to 85 • C [9,30,[36][37][38][39][40]. All data measured in this study were within the range of previously published data.…”
Section: Experimental Parametersupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. 5, the temperature dependence of the HLC of acetaldehyde, measured using the standard experimental parameters, is compared to available data from the literature for the temperature range of 4 • C to 85 • C [9,30,[36][37][38][39][40]. All data measured in this study were within the range of previously published data.…”
Section: Experimental Parametersupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Once the optimum conditions were found for the standard temperature of 50 • C, these were checked for the four other temperatures: 4 • C, 25 • C, 65 • C and 85 • C and adapted if necessary. All trials were performed with acetaldehyde, a medium volatility compound for which ample data is available in the literature [9,30,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Experimental Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature values, on the other hand, are typically derived for very low vapor-phase concentrations of the solute ,~1-100 ppm); at these concentrations, 90 to _> 99.9% of the partial pressure of acetic acid is due to the monomer. Nonetheless, to put these deviations in perspective, experimental values (as reported by different investigators) for formic acid, acetic acid, 2-methyl propanoic acid and formaldehyde differ among themselves by approximately a factor of 2 to 5, as shown in Table V (also see Betterton Betterton and Hoffmann (1988), Zhou andMopper (1990) andBenkelberg et al (1995).…”
Section: Methods 2 (Group Contributionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…• Polyols (C2 to C7) • Hydroxyamines, amino acids (C2 to C6) and nitrophenol Betterton (1991); BC: Bone, Cullis and Wolfenden (1983)-values at 20 ° C; BH 1: Betterton and Hoffmann (1988); BH2: Benkelberg, Hamm and Wameck (1995); HMI: Hoff, Mackay et al (1993); HM2: Hine and Mookerjee (1975); KB: Khan, Brimblecombe and Clegg (1995); LK: Lind and Kok (1994); MD: Martin and Damschen (1981); NO: Nielsen, Olsen and Frendenslund (1994) These are taken from the compilation of Hine and Mookerjee (1975), whose source for 1-propanol, 2-propanol, l-butanol, 2-butanol and 2-methyl 2-propanol is the original work of . Hine and Mookerjee compilation also contains KAW values for 1,2-ethanediol and 1,2,3-propanetriol (aka glycerol) that are taken from a companion paper by .…”
Section: Air-water Equilibrium Constants and Their Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, from 12 to 3 • N, a mean acetone flux −0.6 µmoles m −2 d −1 is predicted using the solubility from Zhou and Mopper (1990). If the solubility from Benkelberg et al (1995) is used instead, the predicted net flux becomes 1.0 µmoles m −2 d −1 . We also examine the sensitivity of the predicted net flux with respect to the choice of k a .…”
Section: Acetonementioning
confidence: 99%