1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)90822-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heparin Therapy in Thromboembolic Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

1970
1970
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Anticoagulation is indicated in patients with thrombosis or embolism unless contraindications to therapy are compelling, but the methods of anticoagulation and monitoring are controver¬ sial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Anticoagulation is indicated in patients with thrombosis or embolism unless contraindications to therapy are compelling, but the methods of anticoagulation and monitoring are controver¬ sial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1960, Barritt et al reported that heparin anticoagulation significantly reduced mortality of APTE patients. 3 Subsequent studies have attested to the reduced mortality rate when heparin anticoagulation was used to treat venous thromboembolic disease 16,17 and to the high mortality when APTE patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy. 18 Our results were consistent with those reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even accepting that without the use of a constant infusion device the rate of delivery of heparin given by gravity drip infusion will vary, it should be possible to ensure continuous action throughout the 24 hours and to monitor the effect by laboratory tests. Amongst the authors who have used the constant infusion method there are wide variations in recommended dosage schedules from 20,000 to 120,000 units daily (Kernohan and Todd, 1966;Gurevich, Thomas, and Stuart, 1967). The continuous intravenous therapy lends itself to the measurement of heparin effect which can later be correlated with clinical effect, and such a step seems necessary if these different opinions are to be reconciled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%