2017
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heparin versus bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention: has the debate come to an end?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior investigations comparing bivalirudin with a combination of heparin and GPI did not allow a clear understanding of the relative merits of bivalirudin compared with heparin, which in turn are best captured by more contemporary inves-tigations. 12 Study-level meta-analyses have attempted over the years to make the best out of bivalirudin data. 11,13,14 However, the best that such meta-analyses can actually do to explore sources of inconsistency across trials is to analyze subgroups, run sensitivity analyses, or undertake meta-regressions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior investigations comparing bivalirudin with a combination of heparin and GPI did not allow a clear understanding of the relative merits of bivalirudin compared with heparin, which in turn are best captured by more contemporary inves-tigations. 12 Study-level meta-analyses have attempted over the years to make the best out of bivalirudin data. 11,13,14 However, the best that such meta-analyses can actually do to explore sources of inconsistency across trials is to analyze subgroups, run sensitivity analyses, or undertake meta-regressions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%