Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003462.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heparin versus placebo for acute coronary syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,16,23,28,37 When multiple treatments were applied in combination, it was assumed that the effects were independent (Table 2). 41,42 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16,23,28,37 When multiple treatments were applied in combination, it was assumed that the effects were independent (Table 2). 41,42 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their potential for causing and haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications continues to arouse caution [13, 28]. Previous studies have revealed that heparin protection against coronary occlusion is independent of the activity of heparin as an anticoagulant and has been attributed largely to inhibition of complement [12] and neutrophil migration into I/R myocardium [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSTEMI can be differentiated from unstable angina pectoris by the presence of elevated cardiac enzymes indicating actual progression to myocardial infarction and necrosis. Both unstable angina pectoris and NSTEMI are differentiated from STEMI in that they are not amenable to either immediate reperfusion therapy with systemic fibrinolytic therapy or immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [7].…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%