2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic hemangiomas: the various imaging avatars and its mimickers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CHs are typically T2WI hyperintense due to the long T2 relaxation time in these lesions. MRI contrast enhancement patterns are similar to those described for CT; however, some CHs show slow enhancement with fill-in on delayed phase images, and rarely a centrifugal (inside-out) enhancement pattern (50).…”
Section: Cavernous Hemangiomasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…CHs are typically T2WI hyperintense due to the long T2 relaxation time in these lesions. MRI contrast enhancement patterns are similar to those described for CT; however, some CHs show slow enhancement with fill-in on delayed phase images, and rarely a centrifugal (inside-out) enhancement pattern (50).…”
Section: Cavernous Hemangiomasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Most HHs are found in women within the fourth and fifth decade of life and often originate from the right hepatic lobe ( 23 , 28 ). Typical HHs can be diagnosed straightforward by a characteristic imaging appearance, with the reported diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for HHs being 96.9% and 60.3, 98.3% and 55, 98, and 99%, respectively ( 5 , 16 ). The unique imaging features of HHs are the presence of peripheral nodular enhancement and progressive centripetal fill-in ( 5 , 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical HHs can be diagnosed straightforward by a characteristic imaging appearance, with the reported diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for HHs being 96.9% and 60.3, 98.3% and 55, 98, and 99%, respectively ( 5 , 16 ). The unique imaging features of HHs are the presence of peripheral nodular enhancement and progressive centripetal fill-in ( 5 , 16 ). Important ultrasonographic findings of HHs are characterized as the absence of a lateral shadow (100%) and no attenuation of posterior echoes (100%), while the presence of a hyperechoic rim is useful for detecting isoechoic hemangioma ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called atypical hemangioma may actually be a misdiagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, the responsibility of these patients should be assumed by specialized teams including dedicated radiologists ( 21 ). Sixteen of the 24 patients in this series had undergone a CT or MRI examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%