1999
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl35227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Iron Concentration: Noninvasive Estimation by Means of MR Imaging Techniques

Abstract: MR imaging with these parameters is a rapid, noninvasive, and accurate modality for estimation of hepatic iron concentration; it is sufficiently accurate and precise to obviate liver biopsy for the purpose of measuring hepatic iron concentration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
97
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, a liver biopsy is used for assessment of cirrhosis, which increases the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, or to identify concomitant diseases. Determination of the hepatic iron concentration by magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in patients with increased serum iron indices (195)(196)(197)(198)(199) and might be useful to establish iron overload in those patients without a pathognomonic HFE genotype and substantially increased ferritin concentrations (Ͼ500 g/L). This technology is now available in many medical centers and might improve the diagnostic procedure by allowing a reliable and noninvasive assessment of hepatic iron, provided that the proper software and calibration techniques are used.…”
Section: Clinical and Molecular Diagnosis Of Hereditary Forms Of Hhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a liver biopsy is used for assessment of cirrhosis, which increases the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, or to identify concomitant diseases. Determination of the hepatic iron concentration by magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in patients with increased serum iron indices (195)(196)(197)(198)(199) and might be useful to establish iron overload in those patients without a pathognomonic HFE genotype and substantially increased ferritin concentrations (Ͼ500 g/L). This technology is now available in many medical centers and might improve the diagnostic procedure by allowing a reliable and noninvasive assessment of hepatic iron, provided that the proper software and calibration techniques are used.…”
Section: Clinical and Molecular Diagnosis Of Hereditary Forms Of Hhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In the absence of a theoretical understanding of the effects of iron on MRI, empirical efforts to estimate hepatic iron concentrations have used a variety of instruments, magnetic field strengths, imaging sequences (spin-echo, gradient recalled-echo), and parameters (T1 and T2 relaxation times, and signal intensity ratios as measured in proton, T1-, T2-, or T2*-weighted images), but no standard or generally accepted method has been adopted for clinical application. To date, MRI has been more useful as a screening technique for the detection of marked iron overload 20 than as a means for quantitative measurement. In particular, with increasing iron concentrations, the signal intensity of the liver is reduced to such an extent that discrimination between different concentrations becomes impossible, 21 at least with current technology.…”
Section: Detection Of Iron Overload By Magnetic Resonance Imaginingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic induction methods have been tried previously for the characterization of the paramagnetic and diamagnetic properties of biological tissues [13] but the sensitivity is considerably low. To our knowledge, the only noninvasive measurement method so far tested for hepatic iron overload in humans is based on SQUIDs [14], [15] or on MRI [16]. However, also much simpler magnetic sensors are studied to allow the detection of physiological and pathophysiological iron concentrations in human subjects [17], [18].…”
Section: Example 2: Determination Of Excess Iron Stores In Liver Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is derived from the change of the mutual inductance M between EXC and gradiometer coil (15) Since at a constant number of turns is proportional to , one can also write (16) The term is much more complicated to estimate. In the simplest approach, we assume C to be essentially determined by the capacitance between the individual windings, thus neglecting the shield.…”
Section: B Thermal Mismatch Of the Gradiometer Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%