2002
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.4.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation

Abstract: Hypothesis: Hepatic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective in treating patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies. Design: Case series of 123 patients with unresectable hepatic tumors or tumors with histological findings not traditionally treated by means of hepatic resection were considered for hepatic RFA. Median follow-up was 20 months.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
84
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even using a more aggressive approach, the efficacy of RFA has been proven to be limited by tumor size [36]. Lesions measuring >5 cm have at best only a 50% chance of being completely ablated [40]. Therefore, most authors do not recommend the use of RFA for tumors >5-6 cm because of the technical limitations of the current equipment used and their inability to provide complete coagulative necrosis [7].…”
Section: The Use Of Rfa In Nonsurgical Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even using a more aggressive approach, the efficacy of RFA has been proven to be limited by tumor size [36]. Lesions measuring >5 cm have at best only a 50% chance of being completely ablated [40]. Therefore, most authors do not recommend the use of RFA for tumors >5-6 cm because of the technical limitations of the current equipment used and their inability to provide complete coagulative necrosis [7].…”
Section: The Use Of Rfa In Nonsurgical Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using RFA, treatment response has been found to correlate best with the size of the lesion; a complete response rate between 80%-90% in tumors up to 3 cm in diameter [24][25][26][27] , and 50%-70% in lesions between 3 and 5 cm in diameter [25,[28][29][30][31] . Five-year survival rates following RFA were reported as 48%-71% by some studies [32][33][34] .…”
Section: Rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF ablation has been shown to be an effective treatment option for patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors, who are not surgical candidates due to tumor location, poor hepatic reserve, other comorbidities, or advanced age (6,14). Furthermore, RF ablation compares reasonably well with survival rates of surgery in patients with smaller (≤3 cm) tumors (7,15).…”
Section: Rf Ablation In Liver Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During energy application, the tip of the hydrodissection needle should be placed at least 1 cm away from the tip of the RF applicator. RF ablation of hepatic tumors is a relatively safe modality with a reported overall complication rate of 7.1% and a very low mortality (0.3%) (6). Immediate major complications include hemorrhage, biliary leakage or obstruction, infection, pneumothorax, and injury to adjacent organs (18,19).…”
Section: Rf Ablation In Liver Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation