2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Resection Is Associated With Improved Long-Term Survival Compared to Radio-Frequency Ablation in Patients With Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: Background: The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is of major public health interest. However, studies comparing hepatic resection (HR) and radio-frequency ablation (RFA) applied to multifocal HCC are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of HR and RFA in patients with multifocal HCC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, few studies report DSS. Our 5-year DSS of 73.8% after TA is high compared to the literature [22,23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Unfortunately, few studies report DSS. Our 5-year DSS of 73.8% after TA is high compared to the literature [22,23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…For multiple tumors, surgical treatment may be limited in its indication. As recent reports have shown that liver resection was more effective than non-surgical treatment for ≤3 tumors, [335][336][337] hepatic resection can be considered even for multiple liver tumors that are ≤3 in number and not indicated for LT. With the development of surgical techniques and improvement in patient management, even elderly patients have shown similar short-term and long-term results after hepatic resection as in other age groups, whereas major hepatic resection should still be performed with caution due to the decreased regenerative capacity of the liver in elderly patients. [338][339][340] Although the long-term outcome of ruptured HCC is inferior to that of unruptured HCC, [341][342][343] patients who received hepatic resection after emergency transarterial embolization for hemostasis revealed better survival rates compared to those who only underwent TACE.…”
Section: Indication Of Hepatic Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multiple tumors, surgical treatment may be limited in its indication. As recent reports have shown that liver resection was more effective than non-surgical treatment for ≤3 tumors, [335][336][337] hepatic resection can be considered even for multiple liver tumors that are ≤3 in number and not indicated for LT. With the development of surgical techniques and improvement in patient management, even elderly patients have shown similar short-term and long-term results after http://e-jlc.org hepatic resection as in other age groups, whereas major hepatic resection should still be performed with caution due to the decreased regenerative capacity of the liver in elderly patients. [338][339][340] Although the long-term outcome of ruptured HCC is inferior to that of unruptured HCC, [341][342][343] patients who received hepatic resection after emergency transarterial embolization for hemostasis revealed better survival rates compared to those who only underwent TACE.…”
Section: Indication Of Hepatic Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%