2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis C virus drug resistance associated substitutions and their clinical relevance: Update 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
219
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
8
219
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies focused on the characterization of RASs for genotype 1 . While this study used genotype 1‐6 infectious culture systems for resistance profiling of grazoprevir and paritaprevir, selected RASs were in general comparable to those previously selected in replicons and in patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most previous studies focused on the characterization of RASs for genotype 1 . While this study used genotype 1‐6 infectious culture systems for resistance profiling of grazoprevir and paritaprevir, selected RASs were in general comparable to those previously selected in replicons and in patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In vitro testing is required for characterization of RASs. In constrast to enzyme and replicon assays, infectious HCV culture systems allow investigation of the complete genome and viral life cycle, and results obtained in such systems reflect in vivo data …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simple identification of subtype 4r, as discussed above, would provide sufficient information to reinforce treatment in patients infected with this subtype. However, HCV resistance testing can be used confidently in settings that have easy access to a reliable, quality‐controlled assay, as recently reported . Classically, three coding regions are analyzed, including NS3 protease, NS5A, and NS5B RNA polymerase, whereas in‐house databases or free‐access Internet tools are used for sequence interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%