1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in a cohort of Australian blood donors and haemophiliac and liver transplant patients

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to characterize hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes using the INNO-LiPA HCV line probe assay and direct sequencing from three different HCV-RNA-positive (serum) groups: (i) blood donors (n = 59); (ii) haemophiliacs (n = 43); and (iii) patients undergoing liver transplantation (n = 26). Of 128 HCV-RNA-positive samples, 74 (58%) were genotype 1. Of these, 41 were genotype 1a, 32 were genotype 1b and one was genotype 1 indeterminate. Of the remaining 54 samples, seven (5%) were geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous prevalence surveys of chronic HCV infection in Australia between 1997 and 2000 resulted in reported ranges of 20% to 38% for genotype 3 and 52% to 65% for genotype 1 (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In contrast to those studies, the findings reported here indicate an apparent increase in the transmission of genotype 3 (51% of incident infections).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous prevalence surveys of chronic HCV infection in Australia between 1997 and 2000 resulted in reported ranges of 20% to 38% for genotype 3 and 52% to 65% for genotype 1 (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In contrast to those studies, the findings reported here indicate an apparent increase in the transmission of genotype 3 (51% of incident infections).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…It should also be noted that the data presented here were based on the use of a sensitive, subtype-specific assay system for detection of multiple infections which also incorporated both longitudinal time points and a relatively large sample size. This more comprehensive analysis may explain the higher rate of multiple infection seen in this study compared to others (19,20,22,25,48). It is also worth noting that this cohort was analyzed using samples collected in the custodial setting, which may impose risk factors that are different from rates of mixed infection that are higher than those seen with IDUs based in the community (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Samples that were HCV antibody-positive (second generation test) and HCV-RNA-negative were tested further with nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the NS5b region as described previously. [14][15] …”
Section: Genotyping Of Serum Hcv-rnamentioning
confidence: 99%