1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(94)80139-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in France: comparison of clinical features of patients infected with HCV type I and type II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains to be seen whether or not such clinically important features of genotype II/lb are shared by other genotypes in genetic group 1. Some groups of investigators report differences in the response to interferon between patients infected with HCV genotype I/la and those infected with II/lb (Qu et al, 1994;Nousbaum et al, 1995), while others do not (Mahaney et al, 1994). Additional clinical and therapeutic trials are required to settle this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains to be seen whether or not such clinically important features of genotype II/lb are shared by other genotypes in genetic group 1. Some groups of investigators report differences in the response to interferon between patients infected with HCV genotype I/la and those infected with II/lb (Qu et al, 1994;Nousbaum et al, 1995), while others do not (Mahaney et al, 1994). Additional clinical and therapeutic trials are required to settle this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients completed therapy and were then divided into viral load are two main independent predictive factors. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] three groups according to the kinetics of their serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activity during and after IFN-a therapy. The longterm responders (20 patients) were defined as those whose ALT activity became normal during the therapy and remained within the SSCP was performed on serum samples obtained just before start-of primers used to amplify HCV genotype 3a were as follows: outer sense primer 5 GCCATCTTTCAGGACATCGAATGGC 3 (nucleoing the treatment, stored at 030ЊC without thawing (maximal length of storage: 3 years), and identified in our serum bank using the tides 1271-1295) outer anti-sense primer 5 TTCAACTCTACTGGA-TGTCCTCA 3 (nucleotides 1678 to 1700), inner sense primer 5 Polytheq software program (Data-Info, Paris, France).…”
Section: 2526mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients completed therapy and were then divided into viral load are two main independent predictive factors. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] three groups according to the kinetics of their serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activity during and after IFN-a therapy. The longterm responders (20 patients) were defined as those whose ALT activity became normal during the therapy and remained within the …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12] One potentially confounding factor in the studies from Pozzato et al and Qu et al is that the mean age of the patients with genotype lb was significantly higher than the patients infected with other genotypes, thus the severity of liver disease could be related to duration of infection rather than genotype. 10,11 However, the case for a direct pathogenetic effect of virus genotype is strengthened by data suggesting that patients with genotype lb infection develop acute and/or chronic hepatitis following liver transplantation. 13 Also, infection with genotype 1b predicts a poorer response to α-interferon in studies from Japan 14,15 and France.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%