A B S T R A C T This paper reviews international and Australian literature related to living with hepatitis C infection. At present scholarly research into this worldwide epidemic focuses on medical and scientific understandings of the virus and its effects on people's health-related quality of life. Exploration of the sociocultural impact of hepatitis C infection is for the most part absent from this literature. However, a nascent academic inquiry into living with hepatitis C infection points to a complex range of concerns regarding diagnosis, disclosure, stigmatization and discrimination against people with hepatitis C. The increasing association of hepatitis C infection with injecting drug use and the medicalization of those affected by the virus suggests a need for further social research. For example, injecting drug users' access to healthcare and information on reducing transmission are two important areas that are poorly understood. In this paper the authors argue for an expanded sociocultural understanding of hepatitis C to account for the material effects of medicalization, stigmatization and discrimination, and the sociocultural impact of treatment on the lives of people with hepatitis C infection. The article concludes with suggestions for future directions in social research to address the silence surrounding living with hepatitis C infection.
IntroductionThe hepatitis C epidemic represents a major public health challenge in terms of both preventing transmission and dealing with the long-term social and economic impact of large numbers of people with chronic hepatitis C infection. To date, hepatitis C research, both in Australia and internationally, has focused on the epidemiology of the virus and medical treatments of infection, with social research literature concentrating on risks for transmission. There has been little systematic exploration of issues relating to the sociocultural dimensions of living with hepatitis C. This area of the literature is a mix of a nascent scholarly research, information from government reports and personal accounts of living with the infection. While valid, at times rigorous and providing important information, the majority of this literature is not systematic social research that investigates a wide range of the affected population. Rather the information is