2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis E virus serology and PCR. Does the methodology matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a 2011 study performed on 100 randomly selected samples in a hospital of the northern part of the country, seroprevalence was found to be 14% [9]. A recent study performed on limited numbers of hospitalized patients with liver diseases and suspicion of HEV infection found an IgG seroprevalence of 15–20%, depending on the ELISA assay [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 2011 study performed on 100 randomly selected samples in a hospital of the northern part of the country, seroprevalence was found to be 14% [9]. A recent study performed on limited numbers of hospitalized patients with liver diseases and suspicion of HEV infection found an IgG seroprevalence of 15–20%, depending on the ELISA assay [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of several studies have reported difficulties in diagnosing acute HEV due to individuals presenting positivity in either one or the other test, but not both. This has generally been attributed to the lack of standardized PCR techniques or poor sensitivities of IgM ELISA tests (Debes et al, 2016; Cattoir et al, 2017). However, as in our patient, a lack of peripheral blood HEV RNA concomitant with intrahepatic replication could explain this dissociation and should be kept in mind in the appropriate clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%