1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01887078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatobiliary disease: A comparative evaluation by ultrasound and computed tomography

Abstract: Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are both relatively new techniques for evaluating gallbladder and biliary disease. Ultrasound is more sensitive than CT for detecting the presence of gallstones because of partial volume averaging errors which occur with CT. Both modalities are sensitive methods of differentiating jaundice due to intrahepatic disease from extrahepatic obstruction. However, CT should not be considered a screening test at the present time and should be reserved for selected cases where ult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although CT is not superior to ultrasound in the evaluation of gallstones [4], CT is valuable for diagnosing gallbladder diseases [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. On abdominal CT study, gallstones may be incidentally detected in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CT is not superior to ultrasound in the evaluation of gallstones [4], CT is valuable for diagnosing gallbladder diseases [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. On abdominal CT study, gallstones may be incidentally detected in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%