2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78775-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best results achieved up to 84% accuracy. [41] The k-NN and SVM classifiers were utilized to determine whether the patients have abnormal or normal respiration, or have bradypnea (slow breathing), or tachypnea (fast breathing). The testing accuracies of the completely built SVM and k-NN classifiers were 96% and 99%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best results achieved up to 84% accuracy. [41] The k-NN and SVM classifiers were utilized to determine whether the patients have abnormal or normal respiration, or have bradypnea (slow breathing), or tachypnea (fast breathing). The testing accuracies of the completely built SVM and k-NN classifiers were 96% and 99%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate predicting the development of cancers or complications of cancers could indicate earlier diagnosis and therapeutic approaches that would improve outcomes. [26,31,33,35,37,39,41,53,55,[58][59][60]73] The majority of these ML applications use imaging data (most often histologic type) for classification of malignant versus benign tumors. Cardiovascular conditions and DM are among the most common medical conditions used in predictive analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the gradient boosting model had the highest accuracy. Similarly, Angelis et al 16 used six algorithms including decision tree, random forest, SVM, k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification, AdaBoost, and gradient boosting to make models based on the collected clinical data. They also found that the gradient boosting had the highest accuracy of 84% and a sensitivity of 92%.…”
Section: For the Diagnosis Of Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%