2022
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging: Differences Between Radiologic and Pathologic Systems and Relevance to Patient Selection and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation

Abstract: The publication of this Accepted Manuscript is provided to give early visibility to the contents of the article, which will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting, and review before it is published in its final form. During the production process, errors may be discovered that could affect the content of the Accepted Manuscript. All legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. The reader is cautioned to consult the definitive version of record before relying on the contents of this document.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cunha et al, attributed discordance to dissimilarity between T2 lesions in radiology in correlation to T2 in histopathology. Linking explant histopathology to pre‐LT radiology is challenging as histopathological T2 staging includes vascular invasion (microvascular or small vessel) or multiple lesions up to 5 cm 15 . Another report by Ecker, et al described multifocality of the tumor and multiplicity of lesions as predictors for discordance between MRI pre‐LT and explant 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cunha et al, attributed discordance to dissimilarity between T2 lesions in radiology in correlation to T2 in histopathology. Linking explant histopathology to pre‐LT radiology is challenging as histopathological T2 staging includes vascular invasion (microvascular or small vessel) or multiple lesions up to 5 cm 15 . Another report by Ecker, et al described multifocality of the tumor and multiplicity of lesions as predictors for discordance between MRI pre‐LT and explant 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linking explant histopathology to pre-LT radiology is challenging as histopathological T2 staging includes vascular invasion (microvascular or small vessel) or multiple lesions up to 5 cm. 15 Another report by Ecker, et al described multifocality of the tumor and multiplicity of lesions as predictors for discordance between MRI pre-LT and explant. 16 A recently published T A B L E 3 Agreement between the explant histopathology and pre-LT imaging in the study population of 6994 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the OPTN-driven initiative that standardized radiologic reporting and diagnosis of HCC in 2011, [5] a similar movement may be beneficial in the pathology realm to standardize and assimilate staging systems and improve risk assessment of posttransplantation recurrence. [47] Predicting post-LT HCC recurrence…”
Section: Prognostic Hcc Imaging Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences cause challenges in radiologic–explant–pathologic correlation, impeding the ability to assess true radiopathologic concordance. As with the OPTN‐driven initiative that standardized radiologic reporting and diagnosis of HCC in 2011,5 a similar movement may be beneficial in the pathology realm to standardize and assimilate staging systems and improve risk assessment of posttransplantation recurrence 47…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors for HCC are significant in cirrhotic patients due to high levels of alcohol consumption. Other risk factors include non-alcohol-associated steatohepatitis (NASH), or patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. HCC comprises 75% of primary liver tumors with cholangiocarcinoma accounting for the remaining cases [ 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%