2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HepG2 spheroids as a biosensor-like cell-based system for (geno)toxicity assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells were grown in a three-dimensional (3D) shape called spheroids, as 3D cell models have recently been shown to better reflect in vivo conditions than traditional 2D cell models. Important advantages of culturing cells in 3D form include enhanced cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions and higher expression of liver-specific functions such as urea synthesis, albumin content, and expression of phase I and II enzymes, resulting in a more physiologically relevant model for human exposure ( Štampar et al, 2022 , Štampar et al, 2019 , Conway et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were grown in a three-dimensional (3D) shape called spheroids, as 3D cell models have recently been shown to better reflect in vivo conditions than traditional 2D cell models. Important advantages of culturing cells in 3D form include enhanced cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions and higher expression of liver-specific functions such as urea synthesis, albumin content, and expression of phase I and II enzymes, resulting in a more physiologically relevant model for human exposure ( Štampar et al, 2022 , Štampar et al, 2019 , Conway et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable progress has been made in research on biological adverse effects with the exposure of cooking emission species through cell incubation method over the last 20 years mainly focused on the high concentrations of PhIP, MeIQx and TDA solution. Most of the past studies focused on the cell cytotoxic effects through adding the PhIP compound dissolved in DMSO 35 . Poudel firstly reported that there existed remarkable differences between the dissolved and particulate forms of PhIP in cytotoxic profiles for SHSY5Y, MRC5, and HDF cells 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, PhIP and MeIQx were evaluated as potent DNA damaging agents through MTT cell viability assay and the single cell gel electrophoretic assay in HepG-2 cells extraction from home cooked and commercially available food sources 36 . Depending on the exposure concentration/time, Stampar showed that PhIP’s DMSO solution at 400 μM (89.7 μg/mL) after 72 h exposure significantly decreased cell viability in HepG-2 spheroids by approximately 24% due to the DNA damage 35 . Cooking areosol contained significant amounts of MeIQx, but with unclear association between MeIQx solution and lung cancer by culture of TA98 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, PhIP and MeIQx are evalated as potent DNA damaging agents through MTT cell viability assay and the single cell gel electrophoretic assay in HepG-2 cells extraction from home cooked and commercially available food sources 34 . Depending on the exposure concentration/time, Stampar showed that PhIP's DMSO solution at 400 µM (89.7 µg/mL) after 72 h exposure signi cantly decreased cell viability in HepG-2 spheroids by approximately 24% due to the DNA damage 35 . Cooking areosol contains signi cant amounts of MeIQx, but with unclear association between MeIQx solution and lung cancer by culture of TA98 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%