2012
DOI: 10.1021/ic300538q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heptanuclear Heterometallic [Cu6Ln] Clusters: Trapping Lanthanides into Copper Cages with Artificial Amino Acids

Abstract: Employment of the artificial amino acid 2-amino-isobutyric acid, aibH, in Cu(II) and Cu(II)/Ln(III) chemistry led to the isolation and characterization of 12 new heterometallic heptanuclear [Cu(6)Ln(aib)(6)(OH)(3)(OAc)(3)(NO(3))(3)] complexes consisting of trivalent lanthanide centers within a hexanuclear copper trigonal prism (aibH = 2-amino-butyric acid; Ln = Ce (1), Pr (2), Nd (3), Sm (4), Eu (5), Gd (6), Tb (7), Dy (8), Ho (9), Er (10), Tm (11), and Yb (12)). Direct curent magnetic susceptibility studies h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 2 , the antiferromagnetic and rather small strengths of J 1 and J 2 may be rationalized as follows: 1) The average Cu–O–Cu bond angle is 112.3° for J 1 and 102.9° for J 2 , respectively, and 2) there is only one bridging OH – between the Cu ··· Cu pairs in 2 with one additional Cl – ion for J 1 and two additional bridging ligands (a η 1 :η 1 :μ 2 carboxylate and a Cl – ion) for J 2 , which lowers the strength of J 1 and J 2 . Similar behavior has been observed in the reported compound [Cu 6 Gd],7k in which the Cu–O–Cu average bond angle is 109° and the Cu ··· Cu pair is mediated by a OH – , a η 1 :η 1 :μ 2 OAc – ligand, and a monoatomic NO 3 – bridge, leading to a J value of –3.4 cm –1 . The weak antiferromagnetic interaction is probably caused by the counter‐complementarity effect between the bridging ligands 24.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 2 , the antiferromagnetic and rather small strengths of J 1 and J 2 may be rationalized as follows: 1) The average Cu–O–Cu bond angle is 112.3° for J 1 and 102.9° for J 2 , respectively, and 2) there is only one bridging OH – between the Cu ··· Cu pairs in 2 with one additional Cl – ion for J 1 and two additional bridging ligands (a η 1 :η 1 :μ 2 carboxylate and a Cl – ion) for J 2 , which lowers the strength of J 1 and J 2 . Similar behavior has been observed in the reported compound [Cu 6 Gd],7k in which the Cu–O–Cu average bond angle is 109° and the Cu ··· Cu pair is mediated by a OH – , a η 1 :η 1 :μ 2 OAc – ligand, and a monoatomic NO 3 – bridge, leading to a J value of –3.4 cm –1 . The weak antiferromagnetic interaction is probably caused by the counter‐complementarity effect between the bridging ligands 24.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, based on the reported experimental and theoretical explorations, the dihedral angles ( α ) between the planes of O–Cu–O and O–Gd–O in the [CuO 2 Gd] units can significantly affect the electron transfer from the singly occupied 3d orbital of Cu 2+ to an empty 5d orbital of Gd 3+ , and the result reveals that the smaller the α value, the stronger the ferromagnetic coupling 25. For 2 , the J 3 value of the Cu ··· Gd interaction (1.8 cm –1 ) is stronger than those of the reported compounds [Cu 8 Gd 4 ]7j and [Cu 6 Gd]7k (0.5 and 1.0 cm –1 , respectively), which can be attributed to the relatively smaller average value of α (3.45°) in 2 compared with those in [Cu 8 Gd 4 ] and [Cu 6 Gd] (13.97 and 9.15°, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, the optical properties of the 4 f ions are modified to a much lesser extent by complexation, the most notable effect being changes in luminescence intensity through energy transfer proceses . The preparation of a whole series of lanthanide complexes under similar conditions is expected to give useful insights into structure‐property trends caused by the gradual change in ionic size, electron count and spin‐orbit coupling along the series …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several reports of Cu(II)‐ Ln (III) heteronuclear complexes ,. Since Ln (III) nitrate hydrates are the usual starting materials for the assembly of such complexes, they generally contain [ Ln (NO 3 ) x (OH 2 ) y ] ( x –3)– which may be linked to transition metal complex cations either through coordination bridges, or via weaker non covalent interactions . Single molecule magnetic behavior is seen for certain 3 d –4 f complexes such as ligand bridged Cu 6 Ln clusters which maintain the cluster integrity even in solution as well as in Cu Ln circular and chain like compounds .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation