2000
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HER-2/neu Testing in Breast Carcinoma: A Combined Immunohistochemical and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
90
0
13

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
90
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These discrepancies were mainly represented by tumors detected as 2ϩ by A0485. This observation is in agreement with the recent findings of Ridolfi (11) and Lebeau (16). When closely investigating the tumors stained 2ϩ by A0485, 6 of 8 (75%) cases with chromosome 17 polysomy lacked HER2 gene amplification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discrepancies were mainly represented by tumors detected as 2ϩ by A0485. This observation is in agreement with the recent findings of Ridolfi (11) and Lebeau (16). When closely investigating the tumors stained 2ϩ by A0485, 6 of 8 (75%) cases with chromosome 17 polysomy lacked HER2 gene amplification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is relatively easy to perform and has rapid turnaround time, and relatively low cost (1,4). However, commercially available antibodies have demonstrated wide variation in sensitivity and specificity for FFPE tissue samples, and the effect of the tissue fixative and pretreatment have a substantial effect on HER2 IHC staining (1,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), although antigen retrieval and immunodetection system currently used have improved sensitivity of antibodies. In addition, the lack of universal scoring system and interobserver differences in interpretation of HER2 IHC result are also important issues (1,15,17,18,22,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors, greater than or equal to 2ϩ "correlated with at least 1ϩ staining using the controls and criteria provided in the HercepTest kit (1)." However, we should point out that using the criteria employed by the HercepTest kit (DAKO), scores of 0 (no staining or staining in less than 10% of cells) and 1ϩ (incomplete membranous staining more than 10% of cells) are considered negative, whereas scores of 2ϩ (mild to moderate complete membranous staining in more than 10% of cells) and 3ϩ (strong complete membranous staining in more than 10% of cells) are considered positive indicators of HER-2/neu oncogene overexpression (17). Furthermore, in breast cancer, those tumors with 2ϩ immunoexpression appear to be a heterogeneous group of tumors, with less than half showing true amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene by FISH analysis (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we should point out that using the criteria employed by the HercepTest kit (DAKO), scores of 0 (no staining or staining in less than 10% of cells) and 1ϩ (incomplete membranous staining more than 10% of cells) are considered negative, whereas scores of 2ϩ (mild to moderate complete membranous staining in more than 10% of cells) and 3ϩ (strong complete membranous staining in more than 10% of cells) are considered positive indicators of HER-2/neu oncogene overexpression (17). Furthermore, in breast cancer, those tumors with 2ϩ immunoexpression appear to be a heterogeneous group of tumors, with less than half showing true amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene by FISH analysis (17). Recently, among 22 pretreatment osteosarcoma samples, Zhou and colleagues (18) reported a correlation between "cytoplasmic staining" of HER-2/neu and increased risk of pulmonary metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca cerrahi materyalin patoloji laboratuvarına gelişinden itibaren immünohistokimyasal çalışmanın sonuçları fiksasyon ve tüm doku takip sürecinden etkilendiği için laboratuvarlar arası standardizasyonun güç olduğu düşünülür. Aslında İHK sanılandan daha güvenilir bir yöntem olup, negatif ve pozitif olgu tespitinde farklı laboratuvarlar arası (14) veya diğer standart yöntemler ile korelasyonu yüksektir (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified