2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00442-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HER2 Molecular Marker Scoring Using Transfer Learning and Decision Level Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the DLF model gave more satisfactory and better results than the individual models. This was the same conclusion reached in a previous study [33] where the DLF model was able to minimize the individual model bias and improve the accuracy of the inverse model. Taken together, the above description suggests that adequacy and diversity are two important principles in the selection of base models in the decision-level fusion process [100].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the DLF model gave more satisfactory and better results than the individual models. This was the same conclusion reached in a previous study [33] where the DLF model was able to minimize the individual model bias and improve the accuracy of the inverse model. Taken together, the above description suggests that adequacy and diversity are two important principles in the selection of base models in the decision-level fusion process [100].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In order to address this issue, we introduced decision-level fusion (DLF) models in ensemble machine learning. The DLF models fuse multichannel/multiscale information and typically produce more consistent and better prediction performance than individual models, have good noise immunity, can handle high-dimensional data, provide complete and detailed object information, and are simple to implement and fast to train [32,33]. These models are extensively used in the fields of injury detection, artificial intelligence, and image processing [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should focus on nding novel methods to distinguish the subtle differences between HER2 0 and HER2 low BC. Some studies have already developed arti cial intelligence-algorithms and advanced techniques of targeted mass spectrometry for this purpose, but the studies in this area are still limited and require validation in larger, independent cohorts [27][28][29][30] . Additionally, continuous training of practicing pathologists seems important, as highlighted by the high degree of variability in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine pathology data also contained immunohistochemical staining for speci c proteins across keratin 5/6 (CK5/6), cadherin E (E-cadherin), multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR-1), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), and keratin 19 (CK19). The expression score was based on the positive area of the protein (0 -4) × staining intensity (0 -3) (9,10) . TP53, BRAC1/2, BRAF, ATM and PALB2 were determined by rst-generation sequencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%