Herbal Medicine for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Limitations

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness (functional outcomes and clinical symptoms) and safety (incidence of adverse events) of herbal medicine (HM) as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to conventional treatment (CT) for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: We comprehensively searched 14 databases from their inception until July 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using HM as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to treat TBI patients were included. The primary outcome was functional outcomes, consciousness state, morbidity, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), when appropriate data were available. Methodological quality of RCTs and the strength of evidence were also assessed. Results: Thirty-seven RCTs with 3,374 participants were included. According to meta-analysis, HM as a monotherapy (RR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.21-1.37) or an adjunctive therapy to CT (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.27) showed significantly better total effective rate based on clinical symptoms, compared to CT alone. Subgroup analysis showed that HM had significantly improved post-concussion syndrome, dizziness, headache, epilepsy, and mild TBI, but not traumatic brain edema, compared to CT. Moreover, HM combined with CT had significantly improved post-concussion syndrome, mental disorder, headache, epilepsy, and mild TBI-like symptoms, but not cognitive dysfunction and posttraumatic hydrocephalus, compared to CT alone. When HM was combined with CT, functional outcomes such as activities of daily living and neurological function were significantly better than in patients treated using CT alone. In terms of the incidence of adverse events, HM did not differ from either CT (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.33-2.30) or placebo (RR 2.29, 95% CI: 0.83-6.32). However, HM combined with CT showed better safety profile than CT alone (RR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.93). Most studies had a high risk of Lee et al. Herbal Medicine for Traumatic Brain Injury performance bias, and the quality of evidence was mostly rated "very low" to "moderate," mostly because the included studies had a high risk of bias and imprecise quantitative synthesis results. Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that there is insufficient evidence for recommending HM for TBI in clinical practice. Therefore, further larger, high-quality, rigorous RCTs should be conducted.

Factors influencing clinical symptoms and treatment of patients with traffic accident injuries: A retrospective chart review with a questionnaire survey

“…Mechanical and chemical stimulation could be sought simultaneously during the procedure [ 40 ], and it also has an excellent safety record [ 41 ], resulting in its use as a treatment modality for various musculoskeletal disorders. In addition, previous studies have reported on the effectiveness of herbal therapy in treating neck pain [ 42 ], traumatic brain injury [ 43 ] and pain caused by blood stasis.…”

Peritumoral Edema in Gliomas: A Review of Mechanisms and Management

“…Nevertheless, it is possible that regulating aquaporins could lead to improvements in peritumoral edema. Goreisan, a herbal medicine used in Japan and other Asian countries (known as Wu Ling San in China and Oreongsan in Korea), is considered to inhibit edema through downregulating aquaporin 4 expression [96][97][98][99]. Studies have demonstrated its efficacy in reducing cerebral edema following stroke [100].…”

Effect of acupuncture treatment on cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury in adults

“…[5] Cognitive symptoms are an especially common and important area of concern for TBI survivors, with a majority of individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI having persistent and marked cognitive impairment (IC) at 1 to 5 years post-injury. [6,7] Cognitive symptoms include deficits in attention, executive functioning, memory (encoding and retrieval), language, visuoperceptual functioning, and psychomotor functioning abilities. [8][9][10] Cognitive deficits can significantly impair activities of daily living (ADL), employment, social relationships, recreation, and active participation in the community.…”