2001
DOI: 10.1097/00008480-200104000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbal medicines for children: an illusion of safety?

Abstract: Herbal medicaments are in common use. In general, the judicious use of carefully selected and prepared herbal medications seems to cause few adverse effects and may be beneficial. However, toxic effects of these products have been reported with increasing frequency. Infants and children may be even more susceptible to some of the adverse effects and toxicity of these products because of differences in physiology, immature metabolic enzyme systems, and dose per body weight. Although information promoting the us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
29
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence biological evaluation of most of these traditional medicines remains yet to be elucidated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence biological evaluation of most of these traditional medicines remains yet to be elucidated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Infants may be more susceptible to adverse effects because of differences in physiology, metabolism, and dose per body weight. [3][4][5] Studies conducted in the United States have documented the adverse effects of feeding certain DBS to children, including seizures in previously healthy infants 3 and death. 6 A major brand of DBS marketed for infants was recalled for microbiologic contamination in 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the four herbal products contained valerian which has been associated with toxicity. [18] In this study serious CAMrelated poisonings occurred more in neonates (60%) compared with older infants (30%) ( Table 2). The low weight and physiological differences in this vulnerable population could be a contributing factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%