2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritability and genetic correlations between rumination time and production traits in Holstein dairy cows during different lactation phases

Abstract: So far, rumination has been used as a proxy for monitoring dairy cow health at farm level. However, investigating its genetic aspects as well as its correlation with other important productive traits may turn this management tool into a new informative selection criterion. However, scientific evidences on genetic correlation among rumination time (RT) and milk production and milk composition are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the heritability of RT across three lactation p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic correlation between RT and MY was estimated at 0.41, although with a large standard error. This value was higher than the 0.07 estimated by Moretti et al (2018) but similar to the 0.38 estimated by Moretti et al (2016) and the 0.40 estimated by Watt et al (2015). Larger RT is expected after intense selection pressure on MY.…”
Section: Genetic Correlation Between Rt and Other Traitssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genetic correlation between RT and MY was estimated at 0.41, although with a large standard error. This value was higher than the 0.07 estimated by Moretti et al (2018) but similar to the 0.38 estimated by Moretti et al (2016) and the 0.40 estimated by Watt et al (2015). Larger RT is expected after intense selection pressure on MY.…”
Section: Genetic Correlation Between Rt and Other Traitssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Rumination time showed moderate heritability of 0.17, and its repeatability was estimated to be 0.45. Moretti et al (2016) estimated heritability of 0.32 implementing repeatability animal models and a similar value of 0.34 as Moretti et al (2018).…”
Section: Genetic Parameters Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Age of first eating bedding and intake of forage before rumination were positively correlated with age of first rumination. In ruminants, rumination behavior is malleable, with low hereditary capacity (about 0.3; Moretti et al, 2018). Thus, we believe that the individual eating patterns of calves may affect rumen development, which also explains why the results of previous studies have different results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our daily MY heritabilities ranged from 0.131 to 0.345. A similar range of fluctuations for daily heritabilities during lactation to ours, estimated based on TD, was obtained by Biassus et al [6] (0.14-0.31) and Cobuci et al [41] (0.15-0.31), and different ranges by Strabel and Misztal [23] (0.14-0.19), Costa et al [41] (0.27-0.42), Jamrozik and Schaffer [9] (0.40-0.59), Naderi [19] (0.45-0.60) and Moretti et al [42] (0.14-0.53). In the study by Nixon et al [20] using 24-h AMS data, the range of daily h 2 was narrower (0.14 to 0.20) than in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%