1988
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-78-457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritability and Number of Genes Controlling Leaf Rust Resistance in Four Cultivars of Wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additive dominant effect (J) due to the second major gene and dominant dominant effect (l) under epistasis was positive for cross 1. Additive dominant as well as dominant domi nant epistasis for leaf rust in some wheat crosses has also been reported by [21] which coincides with the present results in case of cross 1. An addi tive/modifying action of two genes for stripe rust in a segregating generation resulted from a cross between susceptible and resistant cultivars of wheat have also been suggested [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The additive dominant effect (J) due to the second major gene and dominant dominant effect (l) under epistasis was positive for cross 1. Additive dominant as well as dominant domi nant epistasis for leaf rust in some wheat crosses has also been reported by [21] which coincides with the present results in case of cross 1. An addi tive/modifying action of two genes for stripe rust in a segregating generation resulted from a cross between susceptible and resistant cultivars of wheat have also been suggested [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Frequency distribution of plant population for AUDPC revealed transgressive seg regation with respect to susceptibility and resist ance in the segregating generations (F2) of all the crosses. Susceptible transgressive segregants have [21] for leaf rust and Ma et al [22] for stripe rust in wheat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency distribution of segregating F 2 populations was not normal, but had skewed distributions which may be explained by dominance gene action that exhibited in some populations. Bjarko and Line (1988) reported that lack of discrete classes in the segregating populations of the crosses may result in low heritability due to segregation of several genetic factors. Furthermore, Bjarko and Line (1988) noted that the lack of normal distribution is a result of the presence of dominance, epistasis, and probably the linkage between resistance genes.…”
Section: Combining Ability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bjarko and Line (1988) reported that lack of discrete classes in the segregating populations of the crosses may result in low heritability due to segregation of several genetic factors. Furthermore, Bjarko and Line (1988) noted that the lack of normal distribution is a result of the presence of dominance, epistasis, and probably the linkage between resistance genes. Other progenies, the v 2 values were significantly larger than the critical v 2 value in the Table 6, indicating the involvement of more than one recessive gene conditioning resistance to CABMV.…”
Section: Combining Ability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiologically, slow rusting resistance has a lower infection rate, long incubation period and small size of uredinia and lower numbers of spores/uredinia (Caldwell 1968). Genetic studies have shown that slow rusting resistance is a quantitative and durable character and is controlled by several genes (Johnson & Law 1973;Bjarko & Line 1988;Das et al 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%