1969
DOI: 10.2527/jas1969.292251x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritability of Carcass Traits in Lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heritability estimate of CL in this study (0.43) was close to the estimate of 0.50 of Botkin et al (1969) where lambs were slaughtered at a constant liveweight. Thorsteinsson & Bjornsson (1982), using data adjusted to a constant carcass weight, reported heritability estimates of 0.59 for carcass length and 0.75 for both T and F. Bichard & Yalcin (1964) also reported high heritability estimates of 0.83 and 0.78 for T and F, respectively.…”
Section: Heritability Estimatessupporting
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The heritability estimate of CL in this study (0.43) was close to the estimate of 0.50 of Botkin et al (1969) where lambs were slaughtered at a constant liveweight. Thorsteinsson & Bjornsson (1982), using data adjusted to a constant carcass weight, reported heritability estimates of 0.59 for carcass length and 0.75 for both T and F. Bichard & Yalcin (1964) also reported high heritability estimates of 0.83 and 0.78 for T and F, respectively.…”
Section: Heritability Estimatessupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The fat indicator trait that has the most heritability estimates in the literature is C. Although Botkin et al (1969) estimated the heritability of fat depth as 0.51, most estimates included in the review of Wolf & Smith (1983) were near the value of 0.28 found in this study.…”
Section: Heritability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approximate standard errors associated with these estimates were computed according to Dickerson (1969 (Botkin et al 1969) but lower than 0.55'r0.23 (Cotterill and Roberts 1916). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%